ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may adversely affect male reproductive tissues and male
fertility. This concern is elicited by the higher susceptibility and mortality rate of men to the SARS-CoV-2 mediated coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), compared to the women. SARS-CoV-2 enters host cells after binding to a functional receptor named angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) and then replicates in the host cells and gets released into the plasma. SARS-CoVs use the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as a site for viral protein synthesis and processing, as well as glucose-regulated protein 78 (Grp78) is a key ER chaperone involved in protein folding by preventing newly synthesized proteins from aggregation.
Therefore, we analyzed Grp78 expression in various human organs, particularly male reproductive organs, using Broad
Institute Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and Human Protein Atlas online
datasets. Grp78 is expressed in male reproductive tissues such as the testis, epididymis, prostate, and seminal vesicle. It can facilitate the coronavirus entry into the male reproductive tract, providing an opportunity for its replication. This link between the SARS-CoV-2 and the Grp78 protein could become a therapeutic target to mitigate its harmful effects on male fertility.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Center for Reproductive Medicine (ACRM) transitioned its annual training in assisted reproductive technology (ART) from a hands-on, laboratory-based training course to a fully online training endorsed by the American College of Embryology. Here we describe our experience and assess the quality of an online training format based on participant outcomes for the first three modules of a planned series of online ART training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: These modules included manual semen analysis, sperm morphology and ancillary semen tests (testing for leukocytospermia, sperm vitality, and anti-sperm antibody screening). The virtual format consisted of lecture presentations featuring laboratory protocols with corresponding video demonstrations of routine techniques and best practices. Practical scenarios, troubleshooting, and clinical interpretation of laboratory results were also discussed. At the end of each module, an optional multiple choice question test was held as a prerequisite to obtain certification on the topics presented. Course quality was assessed using participant responses collected via online surveys. RESULTS: The digital delivery methods used were found to have largely or completely met the participants' expectations for all questions (>85%). The majority (>87%) of the participants either strongly agreed or agreed that the course content was well-structured with appropriate depth, and that their overall expectations of the course had been met. CONCLUSIONS: This training format appears to be a realistic teaching option to freely share highly specialized expertise and technical knowledge with participants from anywhere in the world with varying levels of competency or experience.